Archive for the ‘marginalia’ Category

Ghassan Hage gets angry

Friday, September 8th, 2006

Assimilationists are the real exclusionists of Australian history. They actually stop people from assimilating.

And this is, paradoxically, what they desire — deep down. They scare people off. They drive them away. They make them hide. They force them to live outside mainstream society. And having done that, they then start telling the very people whom they’ve excluded that they are living in ghettos and that their problem is that they are not assimilated enough.

This article by Ghassan Hage on New Matilda is so good I just had to link to it. It’s unlocked, so you can read it for free.

Gunns to try a fourth time on case

Tuesday, August 29th, 2006

The Tassie forestry industry just doesn’t take no for an answer - they’ve now been told for a 3rd time that their 221-page claim is “legally embarressing” for the defendents (read: “too bloody long”). With the amount of paperwork they’re generating Gunns’ lawyers should be able to keep the industry in business until the trees run out…

Gunns to try a fourth time on case - National - theage.com.au

Related posts: Gunns Target Protestors

‘Access’ for sale

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

Thanks to changes to the laws on political donations, it’s now possible for a corporation to donate up to $90,000 total to a political party anonymously. The federal Liberal party treasurer John Calvert-Jones has been spruiking this amongst potential donors with this letter:

JOHN CALVERT-JONES’ LETTER
AS HONORARY Federal Treasurer of the Liberal Party, may I remind you of the importance of supporting a strong government whose underpinnings keep our country on a firm footing, both domestically and internationally.

Never has our country experienced such financial good health and earned such deep respect from the international community.

As you make informed personal and corporate financial decisions in the coming weeks and months, several resources and an update on recent legislation might be useful.

Amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 allow as from December 8, 2005, the following increases:

1. From $1500 to more than $10,000 in the threshold for disclosure; 2. from $1000 to $10,000 in anonymous donations; and 3. from June 22, 2006, tax deductible donations increase to $1500.

(From:‘Liberals woo new corporate donors’, The Age

(There will be an article on this in New Matilda next Friday. If you want to read it you can get a trial subscription here, which gives you free complete access for a month and limited access after that.)

Update: the article on political donations by Lee Rhiannon & Norman Thompson has now been published - it points to an interesting model adopted in Canada for limiting political donations.

Ruddock snubs legal centres

Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006

Ruddock snubs legal centres - National - smh.com.au

The national association of community legal centres gets no government cash for its conference this year because Ruddock doesn’t like the look of the program. Go figure.

“Australian democracy is an exercise in majoritarian pork-barrelling.” Discuss, with examples…

Do we have a right to expect governments to fund their critics? If so, what’s the best way of ensuring it happens? If anyone’s keen to write about this I’m on the hunt for articles and ideas about this over at New Matilda (yep, I work there now - one of the many reasons the blog has been a bit on the quiet side this year).

The God of war…

Thursday, November 24th, 2005

This article is worth reading for those interested in the US religious right:

Real Christians would not tolerate presidents who make war on defenseless people based upon lies and innuendo. Bush and his imperialist polices should be openly and powerfully denounced from every pulpit in every church in the United States, every day. But they are not. In fact, just the opposite occurs. Bush and his minions are cheered on by the apostates, the dogs of war and poverty. Rather than acting as a counter friction to the machine, the church acts like a cheer leader for grotesque acts of atrocity against the world.

We seem to be seeing the beginnings of a religious right in Australia, but unlike its American counterpart, it hasn’t yet shacked up with the economic right (with the exception of Tony Abbot & Hillsong). That could change. Check out the Australian Christian Lobby

A few hundred billion, tens of thousands, and counting

Thursday, November 24th, 2005

This website has the latest estimation of civilian deaths in Iraq as a result of the war: http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

The calculator at www.costofwar.com has a running total of the estimated cost of the war to US taxpayers. (It only counts the specific, additional costs according to budget allocations . It does not include, for example, wages that soldiers would be paid anyway, or the costs of reconstruction & lost productivity in Iraq that the US isn’t paying for. )

You can download scripts from each these sites to add the counters to your own website.

How not to end world poverty

Saturday, November 19th, 2005

Great article by Vandana Shiva here.

…there is a problem with Sachs’ how-to-end poverty prescriptions. He simply doesn’t understand where poverty comes from. He seems to view it as the original sin. “A few generations ago, almost everybody was poor,” he writes, then adding: “The Industrial Revolution led to new riches, but much of the world was left far behind.”

On Liberty

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005

It is very hard to win a world war.

It is impossible to win a world war on terrorism.

War involves invading other countries.

The vast majority of suicide bombings are based on territorial, not spiritual motives: “most suicide bombings are done to compel a democratic state to withdraw from occupying a Third World one” Michael Duffy, SMH.

“al Qaeda suicide terrorists are 10 times more likely to come from a predominantly Sunni country with an American military presence than from a predominantly Sunni country without such a presence.”
Research by Robert Pape in his recent book, Dying to Win

I would like to think, however, that it is possible to build a world where terrorism is universally difficult and unsupported.

The alternative is Brazil (the movie, not the country).

The draft ASIO Bill is worth checking out - 107 pages that John W. Howard didn’t want the country to debate until it was too late…

Download the draft bill here

Terrorists can kill us. But they can’t threaten our way of life:

Terrorists threaten our lives. They do not threaten the values that we hold dear. Only we do that. If now, in order to save our lives, we seriously degrade institutions that we cherish, the very institutions that an aggressor would destroy if he were to occupy us, then I do not believe that we can plead that we did so under the pressure of political necessity, or moral necessity, or any other necessity that could justify us.

From this article by philosopher Raimond Gaita.

Further reading:
On Terror, by Don Aitken, in New Matilda

who’s afraid of the big bad left?

Friday, October 14th, 2005

I just came across a speech by David Marr that asks a very interesting question: why is it so potent to label the governments’ critics as “lefties”, in a country “which again and again shows its indifference to great contests of principle; a country where you have to struggle to remember the last time the Left had decisive influence on national politics?”

He asks a bunch of conservative columnists for their definitions of ‘left’, and gets some diverse and amusing answers. I like Tim Blairs’:

Those on Tim Blair’s Left: “Greens, Dems, the ABC, and the Carmen wing of the ALP” - are chauvinists, republicans and by nature intolerant. His Left “opposes commercial media (except Fairfax), wealth that doesn’t grow at the same rate for everybody, lack of media diversity (except at the ABC), media deregulation (except censorship), doing anything that makes Australia a terrorist target (except supporting East Timorese independence), liberation of oppressed peoples by any means other than impossible global consensus, inaccurate commentary (except from John Pilger and Michael Moore), scientific advances in agriculture, and an increasingly pleasant, warmer globe. But what is the Left for? Aside from broad, rarely-defined motherhood notions like ‘democracy’, ‘greater accountability’, and ‘justice’, it’s hard to tell. A Lefty friend supported the return of South Sydney to the NRL; maybe that’s it.”

But Marr concludes that there is nothing on any of the pundits’ lists that explains the effectiveness of weilding the left-word as a weapon:

“On all four lists are ideas capable of sparking fears in the community. But not great fears. The lists don’t come near explaining how effectively denunciation of the Left shapes public debate in Australia: rattling the media, sabotaging big public contests of principle this country is so reluctant to face. What is the spectre behind the abuse?

I went back to all four combatants and asked: is it really about money? The Left is never going to seize the assets of the rich, but the Left has plans and they’re expensive. They cost a lot of other people’s money. Is this where the fear comes in?

The idea drew a blank with all four of these anti-Left warriors. But I would put my money on money. “

The Good Life

Saturday, September 24th, 2005

“We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about.”

Charles Kingsley

internalising externalities

Saturday, September 17th, 2005

Last night my flatmate showed me a leaflet she’d found in our letterbox. The front page was laid out newspaper-style, with a photo of a few terraces and the headline “These houses could be bulldozed”. We both started laughing. Our house was in the picture.

There was no emotion about the idea of our house being demolished. The notice went up on the fridge with the novelty magnets and pictures of friends in the Brag - a house joke, like the ‘no stopping’ street sign in the hallway.

Only when I turned the leaflet over did I realise what it meant. Of course, our house was being sacrificed to a road-widening scheme. Edgeware Rd would be snatched up by some new tollway from a to b, and number 43 would join a long line of houses laying down their lives to satisfy the hungry traffic monsters of Sydney. The pamphlet was being distributed by EcoTransit - I thought I recognised the name of the contact person, and I wondered if I should go to the public meeting.

And then it hit me. I feel more connected to the cause of eco-friendly transport than I do to the house I live in. The idea of petrol-guzzling roads to nowhere eating up our city made me angry - the idea of bulldozers in my bedroom didnt.

Why? I think its the life of a perennial share-houser. You might not stay, so why get attached? It’s a way of reconciling yourself to the inevitable. If happiness lies in not wanting what you cant have, then I guess I’m happy - I grew up knowing I could never afford to buy a house in Sydney, so I gave up thinking of secure housing as something I wanted.

The same goes for jobs. Yes, precarity can suck. I theoretically want everyone to be able to have secure long-term employment, but I dont want it for myself. When I started my current job, the HR person told me it was a two-year position. I freaked out, until she reminded me there was a 3-month trial period, and I could negotiate to leave earlier if I wanted.

The same thing has happened to the way we organise - we have loose shifting alliances because we have to be as flexible as the multinationals that stride unencumbered around the globe.

I think we do this because, on some level, we’ve swallowed the individualism. What else is there? Families - scattered, religion - dusty, ideologies - dangerous, authority figures - proven liars, workplaces - uncertain, houses - liable to be bulldozed… why would we have a sense of community tied to place? Why would we not instead become members of a nomadic tribe? How do we live as molecules in an atomised world?

post 2000 society

Saturday, September 17th, 2005

“Post 2000 society is different to pre-2000 society in the same way that a bat colony after you have set a firecracker in the middle of it is different to before, or like a motorcycle gang BBQ lunch just after you give the guy with the biggest beard a wedgie. Look look at all the amphetamine children who spread their wings and panic in the leathery air! Look, how nothing makes sense and there is batshit on everything!

That’s what the modern world is like.”

From How the Body Works, bless ‘em.

outsourced emergency planning in louisiana

Monday, September 12th, 2005

Last year, the Federal Emergency Management Agency paid half a million dollars to a private ‘emergency management and homeland security consultant’ called IEM to ‘ lead the development of a catastrophic hurricane disaster plan for Southeast Louisiana and the City of New Orleans’.

See the press release announcing the contract.

URS is one of the partners in the project - an international planning & engineering consultancy which, among other things, handles BHPs & Rio Tintos public reporting, and provides specialised ‘risk management’ and ’strategic planning’ services to the mining industry: read more

where am i?

Thursday, July 7th, 2005

You know you’re working in a big bureaucracy when…

Dear Colleagues

Please find below details of Mary Smith’s new baby boy and attached pictures of mother and child.

Regards,

Joe Blo

Brushed aside

Wednesday, June 15th, 2005

[This piece ran on the cover of the Sydney City Hub in June 2005]

After years of uncertainty, artist-run space and cultural landmark Space 3 is finally facing eviction. As gentrification spreads in ever-widening circles from the CBD, the rest of Sydney’s warehouse spaces seem destined to meet the same fate. Miriam Lyons asks if it’s time to stop progress.

One by one, warehouses that were once home to artists and musicians have been converted to the cult of polished floorboards & bubble-glass window fittings. But despite endless rent hikes, dodgy landlords, and the constant threat of eviction, a band of determined heretics keep fighting for the right to take up space.

The building on the corner of Cleveland and Regent Sts in Chippendale has been for sale ever since the founders of Space 3 moved in almost five years ago. So when the occupants found out that their lease had been terminated the news didn’t take them by surprise.

“Anyone who’s been involved with it for a long time thought it was bound to happen”, says Space 3 resident Shann Preece.

Since 2001 Space 3 has developed a reputation for hosting a genre-bending mix of emerging and established artists across every imaginable artform. Over the years the space has played host to everything from a Canadian neo-punk band to an installation project with 400 tree roots. It has inspired a cluster of satellite spaces which share a common philosophy - non-profit galleries that don’t charge artists to exhibit.

If the space shuts down, says co-founder Melletios Kyriakidis, the area “will miss that kind of central hub. A lot of artist-run spaces are in nooks and crannies, but this one sticks out - it’s a palace.” Unfortunately, the same high ceilings and central location that make the building an artist’s dream also make it very attractive to developers.

Filmmaker and artist Rebecca Conroy lives in a former wedding dress factory on Meagher St Chippendale, in a space called the ‘Wedding Circle’ that has played host to a gallery, a screening room, and half a dozen arts collectives.

Conroy waves her arm towards the imaginary walls that divide rented studios, collective spaces, and her own bedroom, and then tells me the news. The owners have put in a development application to turn the building into mixed-use residential apartments. She pulls out a coffee-stained blueprint and points: “This is our gallery – but they’ve turned that into a foyer.”

Chippendale still has some warehouse spaces left, but in areas like Surry Hills they’ve practically disappeared. Luke Dearnley, who runs the Sydney club-night, Frigid, talked about his short-lived experiment with warehouse living in Surry Hills. Known as ‘The Project Room’, Dearnley’s home on the corner of Campbell and Commonwealth St was so big the residents raised turtles in the foyer and constructed elaborate slot-car racetracks in the living room.

Dearnley says the unorthodox nature of the space was part of the attraction: “You’re not even allowed to stick posters on the walls in some houses.” At The Project Room, “if we wanted to put in a window we would just bash a hole in the wall and put in a window.”

“It was a very liberating place to live.”

Over a few years the whole building became a hub for creative cross-pollination. Other floors began to fill with artists, and visitors would stop by at each floor, sharing ideas and dropping in on project meetings on their way to the next level. House parties took on a life of their own: “if every artist on every floor invited everyone they knew, about 1500 people would turn up” says Dearnley.

Although they entered the realm of urban legend, The Project Room’s parties didn’t impress the landlord. With the Surry Hills police station just up the road, the parties drew attention to the fact that people were living in a building that wasn’t zoned for residential use.

“We weren’t technically allowed to live there” says Dearnley, but as with many warehouse spaces, the landlord had decided to turn a blind eye.

The illicit nature of their living arrangements left the residents without the rights of normal tenants. The building was grotty, cold and draughty. The 100-year old floorboards were disintegrating into splinters, and the gaps between the boards were full of pins from the old ragtrade days. Dearnley says he learned to walk without sliding his feet. In a space packed with expensive electronic equipment, the roof didn’t just leak, it leaked an oily black liquid that fell in a different place every time it rained.

But the residents didn’t complain. There was no rental board to complain to. After all, they could be kicked out at any time. “We were on tenterhooks the whole time we were living there” says Dearnley.

It all came to an end when a designer furniture business offered to rent the warehouse at three times the price. Over three years the property market had changed, and Dearnley thinks that spaces like The Project Room might have contributed to that change: “Because of people like us living in these places, it suddenly became cool.” Retailers were willing to pay the price to have some of that image rub off on their sales.

Just as cheap rent drew creative types to Chippendale when Surry Hills became too expensive, the same space-addicts have begun to hear the call of suburbs further south. Marrickville is starting to take off, Alexandria is filling up, and even inconspicuous Turella is on the map.

Tom McLaughlin was involved in remaking an old icecream factory in Turella into a home for art collectives and community groups. McLaughlin says that setting up the massive 1000 square-meter space in 2001 was a very risky move: “No-one knew where it was…it was the first time anyone had gone that far out.”

“We would have been bankrupted if it didn’t work. It was bloody scary. I put everything I had into the bond, and it worked.”

In fact, it worked so well that some of the Icecream factory’s stakeholder groups are now looking at the possibility of taking over the whole city block. Frank Cope from anarchist art-collective Mekanarky says “people are realising that if we want to keep art moving on we have to consolidate – no one person can do it alone these days.”

While Turella may be affordable now, what McLaughlin calls ‘Meriton-isation’ has already begun. In the last 12 months medium-rise apartment buildings have sprouted up like mushrooms, and a glossy main road has appeared in the midst of flagging factories and streets filled with burnt-out cars.

Rebecca Conroy is worried that all the knowledge gained from running warehouse spaces isn’t channelled into anything long term.

“The buildings are going, and the ones we occupy are short term because they’re always scheduled for demolition.” The result, says Conroy, is “transitory, slapdash artist spaces that are managed badly and are just experiments. It means that everyone’s reinventing the wheel.”

A spokesman for the City of Sydney is sympathetic, recognising that it’s hard for cultural and artistic groups to compete in the rental market with offices, shops and units. But he says “it is basically impossible for planning controls to mandate the retention of uses in particular spaces”. Instead, says the spokesman, the council has grants programmes and other initiatives to assist cultural activities in the City.

Conroy says that unless they want to move every ten years, its time for artists to stand up and be counted – in dollars if necessary: “Councils are starting to see the value in keeping arts workers in the area – it’s a trade, and if they don’t support it it’s not going to grow.”

“I don’t necessarily like being validated by how much my trade is worth economically – I’m opposed to that – but that is one language that council understands.”

Trevor Brown, a musician who has just moved into a space next to the Wedding Circle, has another idea – he wants to get Chippendale officially recognised as an arts precinct. He’s planning a survey to find out how many people are visiting the area for artistic purposes. Between the many galleries, dance studios, music studios, theatres, and live music venues in the area, Brown estimates that arts and culture brings over 10,000 people to Chippendale every week.

In the long term, making a place for artists in the inner city will take much more than winning over council – it will take genuine community support.

Mell Kyriakidis from Space 3 says that this may be quite a challenge: “The way that this stuff can stop is through the public, that’s where it should start, but how do you get the public involved when artists just want to make artwork?”

Rebecca Conroy says it’s important for artists to recognise that they exist in a privileged enclave: “We don’t go to Bunning’s Warehouse on the weekend, we don’t have our brick veneer homes, we don’t have to worry about funding for public education for our kids because less than one tenth of us have kids.”

“I think that’s a responsibility as well, and it shouldn’t be taken lightly – I think that this community should see that they have the tools to make change in the world. I wish artists would stop saying ‘I just want to make art’. You can’t critique the world and then stand by and not do anything about it.”

“If the owner of this building turned into a philanthropist overnight and gave it to us we’d turn half this space into a veggie co-op, we’d take a serious interest in the community infrastructure. We’d invite the neighbours over for cups of tea – we wouldn’t just be here to show off.”

In the absence of her landlord turning into a patron of the arts, Conroy suggests that “the next stage is to think seriously about buying a building.” With the home of Space 3 up for auction next month, maybe it’s time to declare at least one warehouse ‘unconvertible’.

Note to self - read this once a year

Monday, May 2nd, 2005

Some Mayday reading…

I browsed my way to this article after sitting in on the ‘All Isms are Wasms’ talk at the Other Worlds conference on Friday. My favorite quote from the talk: “A theory is when you have ideas. Ideology is when your ideas have you.”

Tuesday, January 18th, 2005

what are the cultures out of which good ideas emerge? what kind of compass does it take to navigate the new geographies of public thinking?

my most passionate debates are semantic

Tuesday, January 18th, 2005

I’ve wasted many hours defending a progressive use of the word ‘democracy’, and made enemies by arguing for linguistic triage to be performed on words like ‘bourgouise’ and ’socialism’.

But I’m still not sure what (if any?) words are worth fighting for.

“Our underlying problem is that public language can no longer shape power by fighting single, isolated causes. This method of public debate was introduced in the eighteenth century. Today the seamless web of corporatism means that these specific battles for justice end up at best as isolated victories, which are often then easily marginalised… The manipulation of images is open to all of us. But it is the funded propagandist who can most easily and effectively use them.’

“So long as there was no language to destroy the received wisom, it remained in place. Our experiences today with the invisble hand of the marketplace are similar. What we require is the language to demonstrate its comic nature…”

“Some would argue that compassion is a fundamental human quality. I would say that, yes, it is an essential expression of our humanism. But it is produced by our fundamental qualities when they are functioning in relatively successful equilibrium. As for hatred of ourselves or others - what I would call self-loathing or intolerance - that is the product of disequilibrium”

“The corporatist system depends on the citizens desire for inner comfort. Equilibrium is dependent upon our recognition of reality, which is the acceptance of permanent psychic discomfort. And the acceptance of psychic discomfort is the acceptance of consciousness.”

John Ralston Saul -

    The Unconscious Civilisation

Echoes of Lakoff (or Lakoff has echoes of John Ralston Saul).

point for foe story

Wednesday, February 18th, 2004

note frequent combination of publicly dismissing FOE as ‘Western vales’ imposed from abroad, at the same time as using laws to suppress dissent that are either identical to or based on laws used by former colonial governments to suppress independence movements. (singapore, indonesia, malaysia, now beginning in timor)